Search for: "Flores v. Borders"
Results 1 - 20
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 3:34 am
The case is now captioned Flores v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am
But the Eleventh Circuit emphasized that the only Supreme Court opinion requiring reasonable suspicion for a border search, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 8:28 am
District Court, Easterm District of New York against Customs & Border Protection (CBP) for... [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 3:47 pm
KJ Related articles May 9 Action to End the Detention Bed Quota Lawsuit Filed Over Border Detention Conditions: Quiñones Flores v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 7:33 am
Flores-Montano (2004) where the Supreme Court held that the removal, disassembly, and reassembly of a gas tank (which ended up containing marijuana) by border agents did not require any individualized suspicion of criminal activity. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 10:45 am
.)United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:11 pm
Flores v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
Flores–Montano, (541 U.S. 149, 152 (2004)).U.S. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:40 am
Flores–Montano, 541 U.S. 149 (2004) (quoting U.S. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 5:30 am
In Flores v Alvardo, 2018 WL 3715753 (W.D. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 8:14 pm
Flores-Montano on the basis that, The Government’s interest in preventing the entry of unwanted persons and effects is at its zenith at the international border. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 1:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 9:45 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 2:00 pm
The post also includes documents related to the settlement agreement reached in Flores v. [read post]
6 Sep 2008, 1:46 pm
As a result, one principle underlying the caselaw on border searches--namely, that "a port of entry is not a traveler's home," United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 1:36 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 12:34 pm
But a traveler's "expectation of privacy is less at the border," Flores-Montano, 541 U.S. at 154, and the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee the right to travel without great inconvenience, even within our borders, see Corbett v. [read post]
